1 Sweepstakes Casino Controversy And Celebrities' All important Role
vanceepv014102 edited this page 1 month ago


The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gaming.

No, they weren't personally in presence, however the world-famous stars were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable websites providing both totally free casino-style video games and rewarding prizes, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'bet free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of numerous gaming corporations, not to point out suit plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos function as traditional gambling establishments, only without the oversight, consumer defenses and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the steep 24-percent federal sports betting levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings in 2015 alone. Now the business faces accusations of prohibited sports betting in a New york city claim that claims VGW utilizes star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of authenticity' around its product. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm not sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for companies operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of locations like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's speaker, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebs from sports betting lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, along with NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any differences between standard gambling and sweepstakes play.
bet9ja.com
Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, one of many sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - games are totally free

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely touts on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, ads generally center around the social element of the casinos, while omitting the potential for real sports betting losses.

Others lure consumers with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement revealing off Drake's vehicles, planes and mansions before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never ever gave up.'

The disparity in between gambling sites and social or is a bit complex, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, most of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are sports betting totally free.

'Most social sweeps customers never buy,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in quantities far smaller than the typical deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling sites.'

Social gambling establishments provide customers an opportunity to play casino-style games with pals. Players have the choice to purchase valueless currency frequently referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be utilized to open various features within the video games.

But within the world of social casinos exists sweepstakes gaming, allowing customers to acquire other currency understood as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement flaunting Drake's vehicles, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't require normally need recognition. However, websites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable customers to submit mail-in demands for free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific directions. What's more, gamers are typically rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, thus giving them a factor to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment video games for an opportunity to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes websites allowed to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a means of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to pay for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an essential difference between social sweeps and standard online sports betting websites like gambling establishments.'

Think about the method that McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly video game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, however rather they're purchasing hamburgers and fries that offer them the possibility to win rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the game itself does not fulfill the meaning of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all sort of everyday organizations in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home improvement stores,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are regularly utilized by a who's who of family names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous sports betting market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For starters, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach points out, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, therefore suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.
bit.ly
'They don't last forever and they're usually not tied to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] have none of the attributes typically connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments offer" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of revenues, whereas the common payment percentage for a momentary advertising sweepstakes is a trivial share of the income made by the company [usually less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps gambling establishments to the internet coffee shops that emerged in Florida, offering consumers the possibility to play casino-style video games for genuine rewards. Many of those brick-and-mortar establishments have actually since been shuttered over claims of illegal gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to face comparable analysis.
bet9ja.com
'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually consistently been mentioned by courts and state attorney general of the United States as essential aspects in figuring out that a sweepstakes promotion remained in fact a guise for illegal gaming.'

Among the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the concern.

'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are giving up considerable tax and revenue opportunities as this gambling replaces that performed through managed channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.
bet9ja.com
And then there are the complainants who have actually taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, saying the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current claim, which is mainly comparable to its predecessors, New York state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both claim to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'illegal gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have also been called as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment.

'We generally don't talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com by means of email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and stay positive about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games throughout the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a years, developing not only terrific video games, user experiences and entertainment, however also ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the greatest level of standards.
bit.ly
'More broadly, we 'd restate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we plan to strongly defend any claim which may be brought against us.'

The problems between traditional online gambling and sweepstakes casinos might prove problematic for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking illegal sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the exact same time the leagues want to predict a strong stance against prohibited sports betting - especially when attempting to tamp down the occasional gaming scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a lifetime ban from the NBA over allegations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting supposedly illegal sports betting websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a major issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites refers when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise overlooked to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have a duty to discuss to consumers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial collaborations, and our service practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'A few of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes websites, sees things in a different way.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady unlawful sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is also some threat that state regulators and state attorneys general rope celebrity endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with prohibited gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton